EASY SHIRT DRESSAnother cool Shirt Dress. I like this one best of all, as it looks like it requires little or no sewing. Just cut the collar off, put some belt loops at the top of the shirt and belt up the sleeves around your waist.
Creating stylish, unique apparel and accesssories for the woman who wants to turn heads. Isn't it time you dump your old shopping habits and try something new? Shop on buy...I'm waiting to create something extraordinary just for you!





In 1904, while playing an engagement at Keeney's Theatre in Brooklyn, Al started performing in blackface, supposedly at the suggestion of veteran blackface comedian James Francis Dooley. Working behind a burnt cork mask gave Al a sense of freedom and spontaneity he had never known before. The act became a surefire laugh-getter, and was soon booked on vaudeville's Orpheum circuit. Blackface was not considered racially offensive in the early 1900s. White men smearing their faces black and imitating African Americans had been common on American stages since the 1830s, and was just one form of the coarse, humor that all racial and ethnic groups were subjected to at that time. We have no reason to believe Al Jolson's use of blackface was motivated by anything other than a desire to entertain. He was never known to express racist attitudes, and often went out of his way to befriend black performers who were subjected to segregation in theatres, hotels and restaurants. I am not defending blackface, a convention most people consider unthinkable today. However, I am suggesting Jolson's use of blackface is best understood in the context of his era. He was not making a statement; he was hiding behind a mask – a mask that gave him an extraordinary sense of confidence while on stage.If this was the case, then why not use white, red, green, yellow or blue face!!??? Don't hand me a bill of goods and expect me to accept that no one realized how it affected blacks. Again, in Jolson's misguided attempt to "steal" what was part of our culture (being a great "black" entertainer), blackface took on a life of its own embracing a racial stereotype of blacks.
This site fails to mention that most black entertainers were forced to appear in blackface if they wanted to work in front of white audiences. So if there was no racial motivation, then why have a black man wear this "mask" mocking his own self? That's what's so bizarre and dastardly about "blackface". We didn't even create this practice but we bear the brunt of its use.
The Japanese are notorious for showing blacks in blackface, depicting stereotypical mammies and coons on toys and product artwork. No one ever seems to realize that this is not something we take pride in. Advertising can be lethal and no one owns up to it because it's not their race that's being offended.
It's like the world embracing the "N" word. I say, "that's not cute so please do not let me hear non-blacks saying it in my presence." Ya'll just don't get it!!




